← Explore

Phase-locked closed-loop ultrasound stimulation of hippocampal slow gamma modulates CA3-CA1 coherence and improves spatial memory in APP/PS1 mice

Zhenyu Xie, Hui Ji, Mürsel Karadas, Yiyao Zhang, Yi Yuan

Journal of Neural Engineering 2026 · 10.1088/1741-2552/aeb075

rodenthealthyalzheimers diseaseinvasive electrophysiologybehaviour

Abstract

Objective. Impaired hippocampal slow gamma oscillations and CA3-CA1 dysfunction may contribute to spatial memory deficits in early Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study examined whether phase-locked closed-loop transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) could modulate CA3-CA1 activity and improve memory. Approach. A closed-loop TUS system was developed that uses the phase of endogenous slow gamma (30-45 Hz) rhythms in CA3 local field potentials as a trigger. Acute experiments were performed to assess phase-dependent neural responses. Normal rats received 14 d of stimulation to examine circuit connectivity and behavior. APP/PS1 mice received 14 d of peak-phase stimulation to test behavioral and electrophysiological effects. Main results. Acute experiments showed that both stimulation phase and stimulation number jointly modulated neural responses. Peak-phase and random-phase stimulation increased slow gamma power and cross-frequency coupling, while peak-phase stimulation also decreased sample entropy and increased CA3-CA1 coherence. In normal rats, behavioral performance did not differ among groups after 14 d, but task-related CA3-CA1 slow gamma coherence was higher in the peak-phase group. In APP/PS1 mice, peak-phase stimulation improved Y-maze spontaneous alternation and novel object location discrimination, alongside increased CA1 power, CA3-CA1 coherence, cross-frequency coupling, and spike-field coherence, all of which were positively correlated with behavioral scores. Significance. These findings indicate that phase-locked closed-loop ultrasound stimulation modulates hippocampal slow gamma activity and CA3-CA1 connectivity in a phase-dependent manner and improves spatial memory in an AD mouse model, supporting oscillation-guided noninvasive neuromodulation as a potential intervention strategy.

Abstract via europepmc.

Speciesrat (Sprague-Dawley); mouse (APP/PS1 double transgenic; C57BL/6 wild type)
Subjects8, 8, 8, 6, 6, 6, 5swept animals
Sessions per subject14
Randomisedyes
Blindingnot reported
Sham / controlinactive transducer
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingboth
Anaesthesiaboth
Readoutsinvasive electrophysiology, behaviour — CA1/CA3 LFP, spike sorting and spike-field coherence; Y-maze spontaneous alternation; novel object location
Direction of effectmixed or unclearAcute: peak-phase and random-phase stimulation raised slow gamma power and cross-frequency coupling; peak-phase also raised CA3-CA1 coherence. After 14 days, behaviour was unchanged in normal rats but improved in APP/PS1 mice with peak-phase stimulation, with increased CA1 power and CA3-CA1 coherence.
Adverse eventsnot reported

Exposures

Exposure 1: Phase-locked closed-loop ultrasound to CA3 (peak, trough, random phase)

Target: CA3 — “hippocampal CA3 region”
Device: Olympus / Panametrics · Olympus Corporation, USA · V302-SU ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformother patterned
Fundamental frequency (kHz)1,000✓✓✓⚑
Pulse duration (ms)10✓✓✓⚑
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not reported
Duty cycle (%)not reported
Sonication duration (s)not reported
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot reported
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Pulses triggered on detection of a target phase of CA3 slow gamma (30-45 Hz): peak, trough or random phase. Acute experiment: 1, 2, 3 or 4 stimuli per second or all detected events. Chronic (rats and APP/PS1 mice): within each 1 s detection window one 10 ms pulse is triggered, 1 s interval between windows, 15 min per day for two weeks. Acoustic parameters are shown only in a figure.

Flags from extraction

  • exposures[0].fundamental_frequency_khz — 1 MHz appears only as the rating of the transducer (V302-SU) in the hydrophone sentence; the actual fundamental frequency used is in Figure 3(G), not in text. Reader should verify.
  • exposures[0].device — Sentence is ambiguous whether V302-SU is the stimulating transducer; taken as such.
  • n_subjects — Group sizes by species: 62 SD rats, 15 APP/PS1 mice and 5 wild-type mice; the wild-type mice and some rats were not sonicated.
  • exposures[0].timing.pulse_duration_ms — 10 ms pulse stated for Experiments 2 and 3; Experiment 1 pulses not described in text.
  • exposures[0].free_field — No pressure or intensity values in the text; field mapped by hydrophone but only normalised, in figures.
  • anaesthesia — Experiment 1 anaesthetised rats (isoflurane at surgery; acute stimulation in anaesthetised rats); behaviour in awake animals.