← Explore

Combined effects of 40 Hz ultrasound and light stimulation on neural oscillations and cognition

Minghui Gao, Shixiong Zhang, Shasha Yi, Yiyue Zhu, Wen Meng, Hairong Zheng, Zhengrong Lin, Lili Niu

Ultrasonics 2026, 160, 107923 · 10.1016/j.ultras.2025.107923

rodenthealthyalzheimers diseaseinvasive electrophysiologybehaviourpethistology molecular

Abstract

Single-modality 40 Hz ultrasound stimulation or 40 Hz light stimulation have demonstrated the efficacy in improving cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease (AD) mice. However, the therapeutic effect of combined 40 Hz ultrasound-light stimulation on AD-related cognitive deficits remain unexplored. To address this gap, we developed a 40 Hz dual-modality stimulation system comprising a dual-targeted holographic ultrasound transducer that enables precise, safe stimulation of the bilateral hippocampal CA1 regions, and a 40 Hz visual stimulation. In wild-type mice, acute 40 Hz ultrasound-light stimulation significantly increased gamma (30-100 Hz) power and cross-regional phase synchronization, revealing a stronger synergistic effect compared to unimodal (ultrasound or light alone) stimulation. In 5XFAD AD model mice, chronic 40 Hz ultrasound-light stimulation robustly improved spatial memory, enhanced gamma phase synchronization and reduced amyloid-β deposition. Our findings demonstrate that this dual-modality strategy serves as a powerful, noninvasive tool to effectively enhance gamma oscillations and mitigate Aβ accumulation, underscoring its promising potential for AD intervention.

Abstract via europepmc.

Speciesmouse
Subjectsnot reported animals
Sessions per subject14
Randomisedyes
Blindingnot reported
Sham / controlinactive transducer
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingboth
Anaesthesianot reported
Readoutsinvasive electrophysiology, behaviour, pet, histology molecularc-Fos immunofluorescence; hematoxylin-eosin and Nissl staining; Novel Object Recognition, Y-maze, Morris Water Maze; 18F-florbetapir PET imaging; Abeta immunofluorescence
Direction of effectexcitatoryCombined 40 Hz ultrasound-light (US2+L) stimulation significantly increased gamma-band (30-100 Hz) power and cross-regional phase synchronization in bilateral hippocampal CA1 compared to sham/unimodal stimulation, improved spatial learning and memory in the Morris water maze in 5xFAD mice, and reduced beta-amyloid plaque deposition (PET SUVR and immunofluorescence) versus sham.
Adverse eventsnone observedHematoxylin-Eosin and Nissl staining revealed no structural or morphological damage in either the ultrasound or sham group, confirming the safety of the stimulation parameters used.

Exposures

Exposure 1: 40 Hz ultrasound (alone or combined with 40 Hz light) to bilateral hippocampal CA1

Target: CA1 — “bilateral dorsal hippocampal CA1 region
Device: custom-built · custom-made dual-target holographic ultrasound transducer

Pulse timing
Waveformpulsed
Fundamental frequency (kHz)3,300✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)0.625✓✓
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)40✓✓
Duty cycle (%)2.5pulse duration × PRF gives 2.5%✓✓
Sonication duration (s)1✓✓
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot reported
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Ultrasound stimulation parameters: fundamental frequency 3.3 MHz, PRF 40 Hz, duty cycle 2.5%, tone-burst duration 0.625 ms, sonication duration (SD) 1 s, interstimulus interval (ISI) 10 s. Stimulation duration was 30 min/day for 14 days total, synchronised with 40 Hz light stimulation of the same duration/cycle. A prior short-term optimisation experiment tested total daily stimulation durations of 15, 30, and 60 min (US1-3); 30 min (US2) was identified as the optimal condition and used in subsequent long-term/behavioural experiments.

Flags from extraction

  • n_subjectsThe paper reports many different group sizes across sub-experiments only in figure legends (e.g. c-Fos Sham n=5, US n=6; short-term Sham n=19, US1 n=7, US2 n=9, US3 n=6; long-term Sham n=8-10, US2 n=9-13, etc.); no single total number of ultrasound-exposed animals is stated in the main text, so n_subjects is recorded as not_reported.
  • n_sessions_per_subjectThe 14-day/30-min-per-day protocol applies to the chronic AD-model behavioural/imaging experiments; separate single-session sub-experiments (c-Fos validation, short-term LFP parameter optimisation) used only one ultrasound session per animal.
  • anaesthesiaMice underwent surgery under anaesthesia to implant an ultrasound collimator/electrodes, but the paper does not explicitly state whether animals were awake or anaesthetised during the daily ultrasound-light stimulation sessions themselves.
  • exposures[0]No numeric pressure or intensity (kPa or W/cm2) value is given anywhere in the main text for the ultrasound exposure; only relative/simulated pressure distributions and a qualitative ~40% transcranial attenuation are reported.
  • exposures[0].timing.duty_cycle_pctDuty cycle (2.5%) and PRF (40 Hz) imply a pulse duration of 0.625 ms, which matches the independently stated tone-burst duration (TBD: 0.625 ms); no discrepancy found.