← Explore

Deep cerebellar tFUS engages cortical circuits via convergent local and sensory-driven mechanisms

Anvar Sariev, Hongchae Baek, Dajung Jung, Hyungmin Kim, Alexandr Pak

2025 · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8129088/v1

rodenthealthyeeg meg

Abstract

Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) enables non-invasive access to deep brain structures with high spatial precision, but its mechanisms of action remain elusive and under active investigation. The leading hypothesis posits that tFUS exerts its neuromodulatory effects through direct activation of neurons, while others attribute effects to indirect activation of auditory pathways. Here, we investigated the neuromodulatory effects of tFUS on the dentato–thalamo–cortical (DTC) pathway by targeting either the lateral cerebellar nucleus (LCN) or auditory cortex (AUD) in anesthetized rats. Electroencephalography (EEG) recordings from bilateral motor cortices and the contralateral auditory cortex revealed that tFUS reliably evoked cortical potentials, whereas sham stimulation produced no responses. Both LCN and AUD stimulation activated the auditory cortex, suggesting auditory pathway involvements. However, only LCN stimulation elicited early and significant event-related potentials and gamma-band activity in the contralateral motor cortex, consistent with DTC pathway engagement. We propose that LCN-targeted stimulation engages the DTC pathway through modulation of neuronal excitability, while concurrent auditory inputs account for global cortical activation. Proposed framework reconciles competing views of tFUS as either a direct or indirect modulator and clarifies how ultrasound can differentially influence cortical circuits depending on the stimulation target.

Abstract via europepmc.

Speciesrat (Sprague-Dawley)
Subjects8 animals
Sessions per subject2
Randomisedyes
Blindingnot reported
Sham / controlinactive transducer
Auditory controlcontrol experiment
Readout timingonline
Anaesthesiaanaesthetised
Readoutseeg meg — three-channel EEG (bilateral M1, contralateral auditory cortex); ERP P1-N1 amplitude, time-frequency power, ITPC
Direction of effectmixed or unclearLCN stimulation evoked larger, earlier ERPs and gamma power in contralateral than ipsilateral M1; auditory cortex was activated by both LCN and AUD stimulation, which the authors attribute partly to a cochlear route.
Adverse eventsnot reported

Exposures

Exposure 1: LCN

Target: deep cerebellar nuclei — “lateral cerebellar nucleus (LCN)”
Device: Ultran · The Ultran Group · GPS350-D25_FL25 ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformpulsed
Fundamental frequency (kHz)350✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)0.5✓✓✓
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)1,000✓✓✓
Duty cycle (%)50pulse duration × PRF gives 50%✓✓✓⚑
Sonication duration (s)0.3✓✓✓
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)2.54✓✓✓
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot reported
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Protocol, in the paper’s words

50% duty cycle, 1 kHz PRF, 0.5 ms pulse duration, 300 ms pulse train duration (PTD), 3 s pulse train repetition interval (PTRI); each animal had baseline, sham, LCN and AUD sessions in randomised order.

Exposure 2: AUD

Target: primary auditory cortex — “primary auditory cortex (AUD)”
Device: Ultran · The Ultran Group · GPS350-D25_FL25 ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformpulsed
Fundamental frequency (kHz)350✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)0.5✓✓✓
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)1,000✓✓✓
Duty cycle (%)50pulse duration × PRF gives 50%✓✓✓
Sonication duration (s)0.3✓✓✓
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)2.54✓✓✓
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot reported
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Protocol, in the paper’s words

50% duty cycle, 1 kHz PRF, 0.5 ms pulse duration, 300 ms pulse train duration (PTD), 3 s pulse train repetition interval (PTRI); each animal had baseline, sham, LCN and AUD sessions in randomised order.

Flags from extraction

  • n_subjects — Eight rats enrolled; one animal excluded from the AUD condition, so six rats analysed for LCN/SHAM and five for AUD.
  • n_sessions_per_subject — Four recording sessions include baseline and sham; two were active sonication sessions.
  • exposures[0].unspecified_domain.isppa_w_cm2 — Isppa 2.54 W/cm2 is given without a stated domain; the text says intensity was measured in degassed water but does not tie this value to that measurement.
  • auditory_control — No masking or deafening; the AUD target and the uncoupled-transducer sham were used to probe auditory contribution, which the authors state cannot be quantified without cochlear blockade.
  • exposures[0].timing.duty_cycle_pct — Quoted exposure parameters cited from ITRUSST guide ref 56 and prior stroke studies.