← Explore

Modulating Brain Perfusion, Functional Connectivity, and Metabolite Patterns through Theta Burst Transcranial Ultrasonic Stimulation

Daniel Keeser, Lukas Roell, Veronica Meedt, Maximilian Haßlberger, Maxim Korman, Enrico Schulz, Maximilian Lueckel, Berkhan Karsli, Genc Hasanaj, Theresa Faeßler, Gizem Vural, Kai-Yen Chang, Lucia Bulubas, Frank Padberg, Florian Raabe, Peter Falkai, Til Ole Bergmann, Boris-Stephan Rauchmann

2025 · 10.1101/2025.06.25.661571

human healthyhealthyother mrifmri

Abstract

Background Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) is an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation technique with the potential to target both cortical and subcortical brain regions. This study investigates the effects of theta-burst TUS (tb-TUS), a neuromodulatory pattern characterized by bursts of pulses repeated at a theta frequency, on cerebral blood flow, functional connectivity, and metabolite concentrations in the primary motor cortex (M1). The aim of this study is to take a first step towards the mechanistic and methodological feasibility of tb-TUS at the M1 using multimodal neuroimaging. Methods Seventeen healthy participants underwent a double-blind, sham-controlled crossover design, receiving both active and sham tb-TUS to the left M1 over three days. Multimodal MRI, including pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL), resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), was conducted at baseline, pre-, and post-stimulation. Acoustic simulations and finger-tapping BOLD-peak signal guided individualized TUS targeting. Results Active tb-TUS significantly reduced cerebral blood flow (p Conclusion This pilot study demonstrates that tb-TUS of the M1 induces reductions in cerebral blood flow and functional connectivity in healthy participants. Our findings indicate that tb-TUS may be mitigating neural hyperactivity patterns, but preliminary studies so far arrive at differing results, highlighting the need for further research to replicate our findings, elucidate the underlying mechanisms, and optimize stimulation protocols.

Abstract via europepmc.

Specieshuman
Subjects17 participants
Sessions per subject2
Randomisedyes
Blindingdouble
Sham / controlactive control site
Auditory controlmatched device sound
Readout timingoffline
Anaesthesianot applicable
Readoutsother mri, fmri — PCASL cerebral blood flow; resting-state fMRI within-region functional connectivity; MRS (GABA, glutamate, Glx)
Direction of effectinhibitoryActive tb-TUS reduced M1 cerebral blood flow and within-region functional connectivity relative to sham; no significant change in GABA, glutamate or Glx.
Adverse eventsnot reported

Exposures

Exposure 1: Theta-burst TUS to left M1 (active) vs left ventricle (sham)

Target: primary motor cortex — “left primary motor cortex”
Device: NeuroFUS · Sonic Concepts (sold by Brainbox) · NeuroFUS PRO - CTX-500 ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformtheta burst
Fundamental frequency (kHz)500✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)not reportedimplied by duty cycle ÷ PRF: 20 ms (not stated by the paper)⚑
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)5✓✓✓
Duty cycle (%)10✓✓✓
Sonication duration (s)80✓✓✓
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatesimulationsingle value
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)0.62, 0.72swept✓✓✓⚑
Isppa, domain unspecified (W/cm²)6.2, 7.2swept✓✓✓
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Theta-burst TUS (bursts of pulses repeated at a theta frequency, typically around 5 Hz) to the left M1, individually targeted with neuronavigation and acoustic simulation; sham aimed at the left ventricle. Sonication parameters are in supplemental Table S1, not in the main text.

Flags from extraction

  • exposures[0].in_situ.ispta_w_cm2 — Stated as 620-720 mW/cm2; recorded as [0.62, 0.72] W/cm2 (unit conversion only). It is the simulated intracranial ISPTA target window for the active condition.
  • exposures[0].timing.pulse_duration_ms — Pulse, PRF, duty cycle and duration are in supplemental Table S1 only.
  • sham_type — Sham is real ultrasound focused in the left ventricle with a deeper focus and lower ISPTA, hence active_control_site.
  • n_sessions_per_subject — Active and sham sessions over three days; number of stimulation sessions not stated explicitly.
  • auditory_control — Transducer position and orientation kept identical to avoid differential auditory confounds; no masking sound reported.