← Explore

Neuronal responses to focused ultrasound are gated by pre-stimulation brain rhythms

Duc T. Nguyen, Destiny E. Berisha, Elisa E. Konofagou, Jacek P. Dmochowski

Brain Stimulation 2022 · 10.1016/j.brs.2022.01.002

rodenthealthyinvasive electrophysiology

Abstract

Background Owing to its high spatial resolution and penetration depth, transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) is one of the most promising approaches to non-invasive neuromodulation. Identifying the impact of endogenous neural activity on neuromodulation outcome is critical to harnessing the potential of tFUS. Objective Here we sought to identify the relationship between pre-stimulation neural activity and the neuronal response to tFUS. Methods We applied 3 min of continuous-wave tFUS to the hippocampal region of the rat while recording local field potentials (LFP) and multi-unit activity (MUA) from the target. We also tested the application of tFUS but with an air gap separating the transducer and the skull, as well as active stimulation of the contralateral olfactory bulb. Results We observed a modest but significant increase in firing rate during hippocampal tFUS, but not during stimulation of the olfactory bulb or when an air gap was present. Importantly, the observed firing rate increase was significantly modulated by the power of baseline oscillations in the LFP, with low levels of delta (1-3 Hz) and high levels of theta (4-10 Hz) and gamma (30-250 Hz) power producing significantly larger firing rate increases. Firing rate increases were also amplified by a factor of 7× when stimulation was applied during periods of frequent sharp-wave ripple (SWR) activity. Conclusion Our findings suggest that baseline brain rhythms may effectively "gate" the response to tFUS.

Abstract via europepmc.

Speciesrat (Long Evans)
Subjects18 animals
Sessions per subject1
Randomisednot reported
Blindingnot reported
Sham / controlinactive transducer, active control site
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingonline
Anaesthesiaanaesthetised
Readoutsinvasive electrophysiology — multi-unit activity and local field potentials (32-channel silicon probe); sharp-wave ripples
Direction of effectexcitatoryHippocampal firing rate increased during 52 mW/cm2 CW tFUS (modestly at 13 mW/cm2); the increase was larger with low baseline delta and high theta/gamma power and frequent sharp-wave ripples. Olfactory-bulb stimulation and air-gap control produced no significant change.
Adverse eventsnot reported

Exposures

Exposure 1: FUS HPC, 2.0 MHz (Ultran)

Target: hippocampus — “the right hippocampal region”
Device: Ultran · The Ultran Group · Ultran KS25-2 ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformcontinuous
Fundamental frequency (kHz)2,000✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)not applicable
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not applicable
Duty cycle (%)not applicable
Sonication duration (s)180✓✓✓⚑
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatemeasurementsingle value
In-situ pressure (kPa)14, 28swept✓✓✓⚑
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)0.013, 0.052swept✓✓✓⚑
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Continuous-wave tFUS for 3 min (180 s) at 13 or 52 mW/cm2; electrophysiology recorded 2 min before, during the 3-min stimulation and 5 min after; at least 1 h between conditions.

Exposure 2: FUS HPC, 2.5 MHz (Sonic Concepts)

Target: hippocampus — “the right hippocampal region”
Device: Sonic Concepts · Sonic Concepts · SU-132 (driven by TPO-201) ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformcontinuous
Fundamental frequency (kHz)2,500✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)not applicable
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not applicable
Duty cycle (%)not applicable
Sonication duration (s)180✓✓✓
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatemeasurementsingle value
In-situ pressure (kPa)14, 28swept✓✓✓
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)0.013, 0.052swept✓✓✓
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Continuous-wave tFUS for 3 min (180 s) at 13 or 52 mW/cm2; electrophysiology recorded 2 min before, during the 3-min stimulation and 5 min after; at least 1 h between conditions.

Exposure 3: FUS OLF, 2.0 MHz (Ultran)

Target: other — “the left olfactory bulb”
Device: Ultran · The Ultran Group · Ultran KS25-2 ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformcontinuous
Fundamental frequency (kHz)2,000✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)not applicable
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not applicable
Duty cycle (%)not applicable
Sonication duration (s)180✓✓✓
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatemeasurementsingle value
In-situ pressure (kPa)14, 28swept✓✓✓
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)0.013, 0.052swept✓✓✓
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Continuous-wave tFUS for 3 min (180 s) at 13 or 52 mW/cm2; electrophysiology recorded 2 min before, during the 3-min stimulation and 5 min after; at least 1 h between conditions.

Exposure 4: FUS OLF, 2.5 MHz (Sonic Concepts)

Target: other — “the left olfactory bulb”
Device: Sonic Concepts · Sonic Concepts · SU-132 (driven by TPO-201) ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformcontinuous
Fundamental frequency (kHz)2,500✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)not applicable
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not applicable
Duty cycle (%)not applicable
Sonication duration (s)180✓✓✓
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatemeasurementsingle value
In-situ pressure (kPa)14, 28swept✓✓✓
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)0.013, 0.052swept✓✓✓
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Continuous-wave tFUS for 3 min (180 s) at 13 or 52 mW/cm2; electrophysiology recorded 2 min before, during the 3-min stimulation and 5 min after; at least 1 h between conditions.

Flags from extraction

  • exposures[0].in_situ.isppa_w_cm2 — Paper gives 'acoustic intensity' (13 and 52 mW/cm2) without naming Isppa or Ispta; CW so equal, recorded as isppa. Values are with a model rat skull in a water tank; no free-field values are given.
  • exposures[0].in_situ.pressure_kpa — Pressures 14 and 28 kPa given at a 2 MHz center frequency; measured with a model skull (hydrophone), applied here to both transducers as the paper states them.
  • exposures[0].timing.sonication_duration_s — 3 min CW stated; recorded as 180 s.
  • exposures — Two transducers (2.0 MHz Ultran, 2.5 MHz Sonic Concepts) used with identical protocols; results not split by frequency in the text, so four exposures (2 targets x 2 frequencies) share the same intensities.
  • exposures[2].target.terms — Contralateral olfactory bulb has no matching target id; 'other' used.
  • sham_type — FUS AIR: 1 cm air gap between transducer and skull; olfactory stimulation acts as off-target active control.