← Explore

Two pathways are required for ultrasound-evoked behavioral changes in Caenorhabditis elegans

Uri Magaram, Connor Weiss, Aditya Vasan, Kirthi C. Reddy, James Friend, Sreekanth H. Chalasani

PLOS ONE 2022 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0267698

invertebratehealthybehaviour

Abstract

Ultrasound has been shown to affect the function of both neurons and non-neuronal cells, but, the underlying molecular machinery has been poorly understood. Here, we show that at least two mechanosensitive proteins act together to generate C. elegans behavioral responses to ultrasound stimuli. We first show that these animals generate reversals in response to a single 10 msec pulse from a 2.25 MHz ultrasound transducer. Next, we show that the pore-forming subunit of the mechanosensitive channel TRP-4, and a DEG/ENaC/ASIC ion channel MEC-4, are both required for this ultrasound-evoked reversal response. Further, the trp-4;mec-4 double mutant shows a stronger behavioral deficit compared to either single mutant. Finally, overexpressing TRP-4 in specific chemosensory neurons can rescue the ultrasound-triggered behavioral deficit in the mec-4 null mutant, suggesting that both TRP-4 and MEC-4 act together in affecting behavior. Together, we demonstrate that multiple mechanosensitive proteins likely cooperate to transform ultrasound stimuli into behavioral changes.

Abstract via europepmc.

SpeciesCaenorhabditis elegans
Subjectsnot reported animals
Sessions per subject1
Randomisedyes
Blindingnone
Sham / controlnone
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingoffline
Anaesthesiaawake
ReadoutsbehaviourLarge reversals, small reversals and omega bends scored from video tracking of head position after a single ultrasound pulse
Direction of effectexcitatoryA single ultrasound pulse evoked large-reversal behaviour in wild-type C. elegans in a pressure-dependent manner; trp-4, mec-4 and trp-4;mec-4 double mutants showed reduced reversal responses (double mutant more defective than either single mutant), and ectopic TRP-4 expression in AWC (low pressure) or ASH (high pressure) chemosensory neurons partially rescued the deficit.
Adverse eventsnot reported

Exposures

Exposure 1: 2.25 MHz single ultrasound pulse

Target: c elegans neurons — “the head of the animal
Device: Olympus / Panametrics · Olympus NDT · V305-SU-F1.00IN-PTF

Pulse timing
Waveformcontinuous
Fundamental frequency (kHz)2,250✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)not applicable
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not applicable
Duty cycle (%)not applicable
Sonication duration (s)0.01✓✓
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)790, 990swept✓✓
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot applicable
In-situ pressure (kPa)not applicable
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not applicable
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not applicable
Protocol, in the paper’s words

A single 10 ms pulse was generated using a TTL pulse to trigger a multi-channel function generator; amplifier gain was adjusted to achieve desired peak-negative pressures. Worms were stimulated with a single ultrasound pulse while corralled on an agar plate, with and without polydisperse gas-filled microbubbles.

Exposure 2: 10 MHz single ultrasound pulse

Target: c elegans neurons — “the head of the animal
Device: Olympus / Panametrics · Olympus · A327S-SU-CF1.00IN-PTF

Pulse timing
Waveformnot reported
Fundamental frequency (kHz)10,000✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)not reported
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not reported
Duty cycle (%)not reported
Sonication duration (s)not reported
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)1,000✓✓
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot applicable
In-situ pressure (kPa)not applicable
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not applicable
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not applicable
Protocol, in the paper’s words

For 10 MHz experiments the 2.25 MHz transducer was replaced with a 10 MHz line-focused transducer coupled via a plastic syringe and degassed water; C. elegans exhibited minimal behavioural responses to 10 MHz stimulation, significantly enhanced in the presence of microbubbles.

Flags from extraction

  • exposures[0].in_situ.pressure_kpaDomain uncertain: pressures were measured with a hydrophone through the 2% agar plate covering the worm (no skull/bone path); classified as in_situ by analogy to a measured-through-tissue value since the paper does not use the free-field/in-situ vocabulary.
  • exposures[0].in_situ.pressure_kpaList gives two of several pressures explicitly tested (0.79 and 0.99 MPa); the paper also reports a general threshold ('>0.75 MPa') and mutant-specific thresholds ('>0.92 MPa') that are inequalities rather than discrete stated test values and were not included in the list.
  • exposures[1].in_situ.pressure_kpaValue is stated only in the S3 Fig legend text ('peak negative pressures reaching 1 MPa at highest amplifier settings'), not in the main body text for the 10 MHz experiment.
  • exposures[1].timingThe Methods section does not restate pulse duration/PRF/waveform for the 10 MHz experiments after describing the transducer swap; it is unclear whether the single-10-ms-pulse protocol used for the 2.25 MHz experiments also applied here, so these fields are left not_reported rather than assumed.
  • n_subjectsSample sizes vary by condition and genotype across figures (e.g., n=90-135, n=45, n=224); the paper never states a single total number of animals exposed to ultrasound.