← Explore

Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Alleviates Spasticity and Increases Expression of the Neuronal K-Cl Cotransporter in the L4–L5 Sections of Rats Following Spinal Cord Injury

Ye-Hui Liao, Mo-Xian Chen, Shao-Chun Chen, Kai-Xuan Luo, Bing Wang, Li-Juan Ao, Yao Liu

Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 2022 · 10.3389/fncel.2022.882127

rodentotheremg mepbehaviourhistology molecular

Abstract

Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) has been shown to provide effective activation of the spinal cord neurocircuits. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of LIFU in order to alleviate spasticity following spinal cord injury (SCI) by activating the spinal neurocircuits and increasing the expression of the neuronal K-Cl cotransporter KCC 2 . Adult male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (220-300 g) were randomly divided into a sham control group, a LIFU - group, and a LIFU + group. The mechanical threshold hold (g) was used to evaluate the behavioral characteristics of spasm. Electromyography (EMG) was used to assess activation of the spinal cord neurocircuits and muscle spontaneous contraction. Spasticity was assessed by frequency-dependent depression (FDD). The expression of KCC 2 of the lumbar spinal cord was determined via western blot (WB) and immunofluorescence (IF) staining. The spinal cord neurocircuits were activated by LIFU simulation, which significantly reduced the mechanical threshold (g), FDD, and EMG recordings (s) after 4 weeks of treatment. WB and IF staining both demonstrated that the expression of KCC 2 was reduced in the LIFU - group ( P 2 had significantly increased ( P + group compared with the LIFU - group. Thus, we hypothesized that LIFU treatment can alleviate spasticity effectively and upregulate the expression of KCC 2 in the L4-L5 section of SCI rats.

Abstract via europepmc.

Speciesrat (Sprague-Dawley)
Subjects10 animals
Sessions per subjectnot reported
Randomisedyes
Blindingnot reported
Sham / controlinactive transducer, no treatment control
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingboth
Anaesthesianot reported
Readoutsemg mep, behaviour, histology molecular — mechanical threshold (THMS); BBB score; H-reflex frequency-dependent depression; soleus EMG; KCC2 western blot and immunofluorescence
Direction of effectexcitatoryLIFU activated spinal neurocircuits (EMG recruitment) and after 4 weeks reduced spasticity measures and raised KCC2 expression versus LIFU- rats.
Adverse eventsnot reported

Exposures

Exposure 1: LIFU+ lumbar spinal cord stimulation after SCI

Target: lumbar spinal cord — “lumbar spinal cords”
Device: other named manufacturer · DOBO, China ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformpulsed
Fundamental frequency (kHz)4,000✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)not reportedimplied by duty cycle ÷ PRF: 0.625 ms (not stated by the paper)⚑
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)800✓✓✓
Duty cycle (%)50✓✓✓
Sonication duration (s)1,200✓✓✓⚑
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot reported
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Pressure, domain unspecified (kPa)650✓✓✓⚑
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Sine pulse LIFU to the spinal cord once a day, 20 min each time, starting 1 week after SCI for a total of 4 weeks.

Flags from extraction

  • n_subjects — 30 rats enrolled in three groups of 10; only the LIFU+ group (n = 10) received ultrasound output (LIFU- had the amplifier off); n_subjects gives the exposed group.
  • exposures[0].unspecified_domain.pressure_kpa — Reported as 'radiation intensity (RI) = 0.65 MPa', a pressure value labelled as intensity; domain not stated.
  • exposures[0].timing.sonication_duration_s — 20 min per session converted to 1200 s; sessions daily for 4 weeks.
  • exposures[0].timing.pulse_duration_ms — Pulse duration not stated; left not_reported.