← Explore

Acoustic frequency-dependent physical mechanism of sub-MHz ultrasound neurostimulation

Haixiao Fan, Kenta Shimba, Ayumu Ishijima, Kenya Sasaoka, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Eigo Saka, Chih-Hsiang Chang, Yasuhiko Jimbo, Takashi Azuma, Shu Takagi

Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 2022 · 10.35848/1347-4065/ac9faf

in vitro cellhealthycellular imagingother

Abstract

Ultrasound allows non-invasive and reversible modulation of neural circuit activity with high spatial resolution. Despite growing interest in clinical applications, the safe and effective use of ultrasound neuromodulation has been limited by a lack of understanding of the physical mechanisms underlying its effects. Here, we demonstrate acoustic frequency-dependent physical effects that underlie ultrasound neuromodulation, where cavitation and radiation forces are the dominant sources of low- and high-frequency stimulation, respectively. We used 39.5 and 500 kHz acoustic frequencies to stimulate cultured neural and glial cells to study acoustic frequency-dependent neural responses. We demonstrate increased evoked responses due to increased cavitation activity at the 39.5 kHz acoustic frequency. In contrast, notable cavitation activity was not detected at 500 kHz despite detection of evoked responses. Our work highlights the dependence of ultrasound neuromodulation on acoustic frequencies, with different physical effects underlying cell responses to low and high sub-MHz acoustic frequency ranges.

Abstract via crossref.

Speciesrat (Wistar)
Subjects6 cultures
Sessions per subjectnot applicable
Randomisednot applicable
Blindingnot applicable
Sham / controlnone
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingonline
Anaesthesianot applicable
Readoutscellular imaging, other — Fluo-8 calcium fluorescence imaging; hydrophone acoustic spectra (second harmonic and broadband noise) to detect cavitation
Direction of effectexcitatoryBoth frequencies evoked intracellular Ca2+ rises; 39.5 kHz responses occurred at lower intensities and coincided with second-harmonic (stable cavitation) energy, whereas 500 kHz responses occurred without cavitation signal.
Adverse eventsnot applicable

Exposures

Exposure 1: 39.5 kHz unfocused transducer

Target: cultured neurons, cultured glia — “cells cultured from rat cortex”
Device: other named manufacturer · Fuji Ceramics Corporation · FBL40152SSF-FC ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformnot reported
Fundamental frequency (kHz)39.5✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)41.7✓✓✓
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not reported
Duty cycle (%)not reported
Sonication duration (s)not reported
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)0.002, 0.049swept✓✓✓⚑
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot applicable
In-situ pressure (kPa)not applicable
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not applicable
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not applicable
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Sinusoidal drive with a pulse duration of 41.7 ms; intensity changed stepwise with 3 min between changes. Number of pulses per intensity and any repetition rate are not stated in the text.

Exposure 2: 500 kHz unfocused transducer

Target: cultured neurons, cultured glia — “cells cultured from rat cortex”
Device: other named manufacturer · Japan Probe · 0.5K1OI ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformnot reported
Fundamental frequency (kHz)500✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)41.7✓✓✓
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not reported
Duty cycle (%)not reported
Sonication duration (s)not reported
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)0.09, 0.55swept✓✓✓⚑
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot applicable
In-situ pressure (kPa)not applicable
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not applicable
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not applicable
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Sinusoidal drive with a pulse duration of 41.7 ms; intensity changed stepwise with 3 min between changes. Number of pulses per intensity and any repetition rate are not stated in the text.

Flags from extraction

  • exposures[0].free_field.isppa_w_cm2 — Intensities were calculated from pressure measured in a water tank under progressive-wave conditions; the cultures were exposed in standing-wave conditions, so cell exposure is higher than stated. Recorded as free_field.
  • exposures[1].free_field.isppa_w_cm2 — Same standing-wave caveat as exposures[0].
  • exposures[0].timing — Only a 41.7 ms pulse duration is stated; PRF, number of pulses and sonication duration are not given in the text (timing schematic is Fig. 2b). Waveform left not_reported.
  • n_subjects — N = 6 dishes is stated in figure captions (Figs 3 and 4); whether the same count applies to both frequencies is not stated.
  • exposures[0].device.family — Transducers named with a supplier and part number only; classed other_manufacturer.
  • auditory_control — Paper uses cell culture to avoid off-target auditory responses but no auditory control is described.