Stimulation of the hepatoportal nerve plexus with focused ultrasound restores glucose homoeostasis in diabetic mice, rats and swine
Victoria Cotero, John Graf, Hiromi Miwa, Zall Hirschstein, Khaled Qanud, Tomás S. Huerta, Ningwen Tai, Yuyan Ding, Kevin Jimenez-Cowell, Jacquelyn N. Tomaio, Weiguo Song, Alex Devarajan, Tea Tsaava, Radhika Madhavan, Kirk Wallace, Evelina Loghin, Christine Morton, Ying Fan, Tzu-Jen Kao, Kainat Akhtar, Meghana Damaraju, Linda Barenboim, Teresa Maietta, Jeffrey Ashe, Kevin J. Tracey, Thomas R. Coleman, Dino Di Carlo, Damian Shin, Stavros Zanos, Sangeeta S. Chavan, Raimund I. Herzog, Chris Puleo
Nature Biomedical Engineering 2022 · 10.1038/s41551-022-00870-w
Abstract
Peripheral neurons that sense glucose relay signals of glucose availability to integrative clusters of neurons in the brain. However, the roles of such signalling pathways in the maintenance of glucose homoeostasis and their contribution to disease are unknown. Here we show that the selective activation of the nerve plexus of the hepatic portal system via peripheral focused ultrasound stimulation (pFUS) improves glucose homoeostasis in mice and rats with insulin-resistant diabetes and in swine subject to hyperinsulinemic-euglycaemic clamps. pFUS modulated the activity of sensory projections to the hypothalamus, altered the concentrations of metabolism-regulating neurotransmitters, and enhanced glucose tolerance and utilization in the three species, whereas physical transection or chemical blocking of the liver-brain nerve pathway abolished the effect of pFUS on glucose tolerance. Longitudinal multi-omic profiling of metabolic tissues from the treated animals confirmed pFUS-induced modifications of key metabolic functions in liver, pancreas, muscle, adipose, kidney and intestinal tissues. Non-invasive ultrasound activation of afferent autonomic nerves may represent a non-pharmacologic therapy for the restoration of glucose homoeostasis in type-2 diabetes and other metabolic diseases.
Abstract via europepmc.
Exposures
Exposure 1: Chronic/acute hepatic pFUS in ZDF/DIO rats and western-diet mice (1.1 MHz pre-clinical system)
Target: nerve plexus — “hepatoportal nerve plexus at the porta hepatis”
Device: Sonic Concepts · Sonic Concepts · H102 single-element focused transducer
| Waveform | pulsed | |
|---|---|---|
| Fundamental frequency (kHz) | 1,100 | ✓✓✓ |
| Pulse duration (ms) | 0.15 | ✓✓✓ |
| Pulse repetition frequency (Hz) | 5 | ✓✓✓ |
| Duty cycle (%) | not reportedpulse duration × PRF gives 0.075% | |
| Sonication duration (s) | 180 | ✓✓✓ |
| Free-field pressure (kPa) | not reported | |
|---|---|---|
| Free-field Isppa (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| Free-field Ispta (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| In-situ estimate | deratingmean or range across subjects | |
| In-situ pressure (kPa) | 1,870 | ✓✓✓ |
| In-situ Isppa (W/cm²) | 125.7 | ✓✓✓ |
| In-situ Ispta (W/cm²) | 0.0943, 0.581swept | ✓✓✓⚑ |
pFUS was applied transcutaneously to the image-marked porta hepatis under isoflurane anaesthesia for 3 min, once daily for chronic studies (up to 40-56 d) or as a single stimulus before an oral/IV glucose tolerance test; sham animals underwent identical handling with the transducer powered off. One description of the ZDF-pFUS protocol states '150 burst cycles, 500 microsecond burst period', which would imply either a ~136 microsecond pulse (consistent with the 150 microsecond nominal pulse duration) at an unstated repetition period, or a much higher (2 kHz) repetition rate than the '5 Hz pulse repetition frequency' given as the nominal system setting; this could not be resolved.
Exposure 2: Hepatic pFUS during hypothalamic (PVN) electrophysiological recording (2.5 MHz system)
Target: nerve plexus — “hepatoportal nerve plexus at the porta hepatis (during PVN single-unit recording)”
Device: custom-built · custom-made 2.5 MHz focused single-element ultrasound transducer ✓
| Waveform | pulsed | |
|---|---|---|
| Fundamental frequency (kHz) | 2,500 | ✓✓✓ |
| Pulse duration (ms) | 0.12 | ✓✓✓ |
| Pulse repetition frequency (Hz) | 5 | ✓✓✓ |
| Duty cycle (%) | not reportedpulse duration × PRF gives 0.06% | |
| Sonication duration (s) | not reported | ⚑ |
| Free-field pressure (kPa) | not reported | |
|---|---|---|
| Free-field Isppa (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| Free-field Ispta (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| In-situ estimate | not reported | |
| In-situ pressure (kPa) | not reported | |
| In-situ Isppa (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| In-situ Ispta (W/cm²) | not reported |
Used only for the hypothalamic PVN single-unit recording experiments (Fig. 5), where hepatic pFUS was delivered while glucose-sensing PVN neuron firing was recorded following intraperitoneal glucose injection; stimulation duration for this specific protocol is not stated.
Exposure 3: Hepatic pFUS in swine during hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp (clinical GE LOGIQ E10 system)
Target: nerve plexus — “hepatoportal nerve plexus at the porta hepatis (swine)”
Device: other named manufacturer · GE Healthcare · LOGIQ E10 with C1-6 abdominal probe ✓
| Waveform | pulsed | |
|---|---|---|
| Fundamental frequency (kHz) | 2,280 | ✓✓✓ |
| Pulse duration (ms) | 0.2 | ✓✓✓ |
| Pulse repetition frequency (Hz) | 3.7 | ✓✓✓ |
| Duty cycle (%) | not reportedpulse duration × PRF gives 0.074% | |
| Sonication duration (s) | 180 | ✓? |
| Free-field pressure (kPa) | not reported | |
|---|---|---|
| Free-field Isppa (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| Free-field Ispta (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| In-situ estimate | deratingsingle value | |
| In-situ pressure (kPa) | not reported | |
| In-situ Isppa (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| In-situ Ispta (W/cm²) | 0.503 | ✓✓✓ |
In healthy swine, a 3 min pFUS stimulus was applied to the ultrasound-image-targeted porta hepatis during a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp, using a clinically available diagnostic ultrasound system reconfigured in research mode; parameters were designed to achieve a mechanical index of ~1.77, within current FDA diagnostic-ultrasound limits.
Exposure 4: In vitro pFUS stimulation of 3D dorsal root ganglion neuron cultures
Target: dorsal root ganglion culture — “primary dorsal root ganglion (DRG) sensory neurons in 3D hydrogel culture”
Device: Sonic Concepts · Sonic Concepts · H102 single-element focused transducer (pre-clinical hepatic pFUS system)
| Waveform | pulsed | |
|---|---|---|
| Fundamental frequency (kHz) | 1,100 | ✓✓✓ |
| Pulse duration (ms) | not reported | |
| Pulse repetition frequency (Hz) | not reported | |
| Duty cycle (%) | not reported | |
| Sonication duration (s) | not reported |
| Free-field pressure (kPa) | not reported | |
|---|---|---|
| Free-field Isppa (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| Free-field Ispta (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| In-situ estimate | not applicable | |
| In-situ pressure (kPa) | not applicable | |
| In-situ Isppa (W/cm²) | not applicable | |
| In-situ Ispta (W/cm²) | not applicable | |
| Pressure, domain unspecified (kPa) | 830 | ✓✓✓ |
3D cultures of DRG sensory neurons in porous hydrogel scaffolds were stimulated with the same pre-clinical hepatic pFUS transducer/generator system, coupled to each culture well, using pulse parameters and pressures corresponding to the in vivo hepatic experiments; calcium (Fluo4) imaging showed increased fluorescence during pFUS 'on' periods that returned to baseline when pFUS was turned off, and this response was blocked by mechanosensitive/TRPA1 channel blockers (GsMTx4, HC-030031) but not by TTX or omega-conotoxin.
Flags from extraction
n_subjects— This is a multi-species, multi-experiment paper (chronic/acute glucose studies, clamps, nerve-block studies, electrophysiology, multi-omics, in vitro) with dozens of small, non-overlapping cohorts (n typically 4-20) and no single stated aggregate subject total; left not_reported.exposures[0].timing.protocol_description— One sentence describing the ZDF-pFUS protocol gives '150 burst cycles, 500 microsecond burst period', which is hard to reconcile with the system's stated nominal '150 microsecond pulse duration' and '5 Hz pulse repetition frequency'; not entered as a numeric value because the intended quantities are unclear.exposures[0].in_situ.ispta_w_cm2— Two different derated Ispta values are reported for the same 1.1 MHz rodent system: 94.3 +/- 11.2 mW/cm2 from bench characterisation at the nominal 135 mV drive amplitude, and ~581 mW/cm2 'at the ~5 mm target depth in the rats' quoted when describing the swine dose; both are retained as list entries since the paper does not reconcile them (likely different drive amplitudes, given the stated linear MI-vs-amplitude scaling).exposures[1].timing.sonication_duration_s— The stimulus duration used during the PVN electrophysiology recording experiments (Fig. 5) is not stated; the 3-min duration used elsewhere is not assumed to apply.exposures[3].timing— The in vitro DRG culture experiments reuse the pre-clinical 1.1 MHz hepatic pFUS system, but no pulse duration, PRF, duty cycle or per-trial duration specific to the culture experiments is stated in the text; only the 0.83 MPa peak-positive pressure is given.direction_of_effect— Effects on circulating hormones (leptin, GLP-1, ghrelin, norepinephrine) differed in direction between the ZDF and DIO models, and pFUS attenuated but did not reverse the direction of glucose-induced firing-rate changes in hypothalamic glucose-excited neurons; classified as mixed_or_unclear rather than a single direction.