← Explore

Rebound Excitation of Epileptiform Activities by Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulation

Taewon Choi, Minseok Koo, Jaesoon Joo, Taekyung Kim, Young-Min Shon, Jinhyoung Park

2022 · 10.1101/2022.04.30.490021

rodentepilepsyeeg meghistology molecularcerebral haemodynamics

Abstract

Background Conventional neurostimulations to treat epilepsy have adverse effects caused by post-inhibitory rebound excitations. Although ultrasound brain stimulation is feasible in inducing anticonvulsant effects, its association with paradoxical rebound excitations is unknown. Objective This study aimed at demonstrating rebound excitations with transcranial focused ultrasound. The modulations of epileptiform activities toward both suppressive and excitatory responses were investigated by changing ultrasonic transmit sequences. Methods In a pentylenetetrazol-injected acute epilepsy rat model, transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation was applied on the thalamus to modulate epileptiform activities. The parameters differentiated for pulse sequences were the pulse length, pulse pressure, and interval between the pulses. Sonication effects were assessed by electroencephalography (n=38), immuno-histochemical analysis (n=24), and optical measurement of cerebral blood volume changes (n=18). Results While ultrasonic patterns of stimuli at long intervals showed antiepileptic effects on electroencephalography, those at short intervals showed rebound excitatory responses followed by inhibitory activities. Further, suppressive states induced by inhibitory stimulations were transformed into excitatory states by applying a consecutive series of short bursts at higher acoustic pressure. Cerebral blood volume changes demonstrated consistent results with electroencephalography. Immunohistochemistry revealed that both inhibitory and excitatory neuronal cells were activated to generate rebound excitatory conditions, while inhibitory cells were activated for suppressive conditions. Conclusions In our study, variations in ultrasound stimulation patterns could modulate epileptiform activities in both upregulated and downregulated directions.

Abstract via europepmc.

Speciesrat (Sprague-Dawley)
Subjects5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 3, 3, 3, 3swept animals
Sessions per subjectnot reported
Randomisednot reported
Blindingnot reported
Sham / controlno treatment control
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingboth
Anaesthesiaanaesthetised
Readoutseeg meg, histology molecular, cerebral haemodynamics — cortical screw EEG (epileptic spike counts, power spectral density); c-Fos, GAD65, Iba1, GFAP immunohistochemistry; wide-field optical imaging of cerebral blood volume
Direction of effectbidirectionalLong (40 s) bursts at long intervals suppressed PTZ-induced epileptiform activity; short (10 s) bursts, short intervals (20 s), or high-pressure short bursts produced rebound excitation after sonication.
Adverse eventsobservedSome sequences (TX1, TX6) worsened epileptiform activity and raised Iba1 and GFAP counts relative to PTZ controls; Nissl staining showed no damage after TX3 and TX5 in the supplementary figure.

Exposures

Exposure 1: Right anterior thalamic nuclei, 690 kHz, sequences TX1 to TX6

Target: anterior thalamic nucleus — “right anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN)”
Device: custom-built · DeL Piezo Specialties LLC. (PZT element) · 690 kHz single-element ring transducer (DL-47 PZT), fabricated in-house ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformpulsed
Fundamental frequency (kHz)690✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)5✓✓✓⚑
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)100✓✓✓
Duty cycle (%)50pulse duration × PRF gives 50%✓✓✓
Sonication duration (s)0.25, 10, 20, 40swept✓✓✓⚑
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot reported
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Pressure, domain unspecified (kPa)250, 1,000swept✓✓✓⚑
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Pulses of a 5 ms, 3,450-cycle, 690 kHz burst at 100 Hz (50% duty). TX1 to TX4: low pressure (0.25 MPa), six bursts of 10 s (TX1), 20 s (TX2) or 40 s (TX3, TX4) with burst intervals of 50, 40, 40 and 20 s. TX5: 1.0 MPa, 250 ms bursts every 30 s for 5 min. TX6: TX3 followed by TX5 after a 3 min rest.

Flags from extraction

  • n_subjects — 59 rats were used in total including PTZ-only and normal controls and separate cohorts for EEG, histology and optical imaging; the number exposed to ultrasound is not stated as one total.
  • exposures[0].unspecified_domain.pressure_kpa — 0.25 MPa for TX1 to TX4 and 1.0 MPa for TX5; the paper does not say whether these are free-field or in-brain values.
  • exposures[0].timing.pulse_duration_ms — Burst rule resolved by arithmetic: the 5 ms burst at 100 Hz gives the stated 50% duty cycle, so 5 ms is the pulse and the 10 to 40 s bursts are trains.
  • exposures[0].timing.sonication_duration_s — 10, 20 and 40 s trains for TX1 to TX4; TX5 uses 250 ms bursts, described in the protocol text only.
  • exposures[0].target.terms — Target stated as right ATN from stereotactic coordinates; the beam focus is 4.7 mm long axially.
  • sham_type — PTZ-injected rats without tFUS (PTZ-control) and normal controls; no sham device condition.