Neuroprotective Effect of Ultrasound Neuromodulation on Kainic Acid- Induced Epilepsy in Mice
Junjie Zou, Shasha Yi, Lili Niu, Hui Zhou, Zhengrong Lin, Yibo Wang, Xiaowei Huang, Wen Meng, Yanwu Guo, Lin Qi, Long Meng
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 2021 · 10.1109/tuffc.2021.3079628
Abstract
Preliminary evidence suggests that low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has neuroprotective effects on ischemic stroke, depression, and other conditions leading to neuronal cell death (e.g., Parkinson's disease). The purpose of this study was to investigate the neuroprotective effects of LIPUS in epileptic mice. Mice were made epileptic through kainic acid (KA) administration and then stimulated with LIPUS. The neuroprotective effect of ultrasound was evaluated by observing the latency, anxiety-like behavior, and levels of proteins related to inflammation, apoptosis, or signaling pathways. The safety of LIPUS was assessed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Nissl stainings. LIPUS prolonged the latency (Sham: 6.00 ± 0.26 days; 1-kHz pulse repetition frequency (PRF): 7.00 ± 0.31 days), improved the anxiety-like behavior, and inhibited the expression of inflammatory factors and apoptosis-related proteins. In addition, H&E and Nissl staining results confirmed that LIPUS did not damage the brain. These findings suggest that LIPUS has neuroprotective effects in mice with KA-induced epilepsy. LIPUS may offer a new therapeutic approach to epilepsy.
Abstract via europepmc.
Exposures
Exposure 1: LIPUS of left cortex and hippocampus, PRF 1 kHz and 10 Hz
Target: cerebral cortex, hippocampus, CA1, CA3 — “left cortex and hippocampus (including CA1 and CA3)”
Device: custom-built · in-house (Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology) ✓
| Waveform | pulsed | |
|---|---|---|
| Fundamental frequency (kHz) | 3,600 | ✓✓✓⚑ |
| Pulse duration (ms) | not reported | ⚑ |
| Pulse repetition frequency (Hz) | 10, 1,000swept | ✓✓✓ |
| Duty cycle (%) | 50 | ✓✓✓ |
| Sonication duration (s) | 1 | ✓✓✓ |
| Free-field pressure (kPa) | not reported | |
|---|---|---|
| Free-field Isppa (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| Free-field Ispta (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| In-situ estimate | not reported | |
| In-situ pressure (kPa) | not reported | |
| In-situ Isppa (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| In-situ Ispta (W/cm²) | not reported | |
| Pressure, domain unspecified (kPa) | 612 | ✓✓✓⚑ |
| Ispta, domain unspecified (W/cm²) | 0.379 | ✓✓✓⚑ |
PRF 1 kHz (or 10 Hz), duty cycle 50%, burst duration (BD) 1 s, interstimulus interval 4 s (text) for 30 min/day for seven consecutive days; the Fig. 1 legend gives ISI = 3 s. Behavioural tests and c-Fos used the 1-kHz PRF only.
Flags from extraction
exposures[0].timing.pulse_duration_ms— 'Burst duration' of 1 s is the train; pulse duration not stated (DC 50% at 1 kHz would imply 0.5 ms but not computed)exposures[0].timing.protocol_description— Text gives ISI 4 s; Fig. 1 legend states ISI = 3 sexposures[0].unspecified_domain.pressure_kpa— 0.612 MPa described as negative peak acoustic pressure in the safety discussion; domain not stated (Fig. 1d shows about 65% skull attenuation)exposures[0].unspecified_domain.ispta_w_cm2— 378.70 mW/cm2 converted to W/cm2; domain not statedn_subjects— 76 mice total, split across several assays with different group sizes and a no-KA control groupexposures[0].fundamental_frequency_khz— Fig. 1 legend also lists 3.6 MHz fundamental frequency