Low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound ameliorates depression‐like behaviors in a rat model of chronic unpredictable stress
Jinniu Zhang, Hui Zhou, Jian Yang, Jun Jia, Lili Niu, Zuoli Sun, Dandan Shi, Long Meng, Weibao Qiu, Xiaomin Wang, Hairong Zheng, Gang Wang
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 2021, 27, 233-243 · 10.1111/cns.13463
Abstract
Introduction There is an unmet need for better nonpharmaceutical treatments for depression. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a novel type of neuromodulation that could be helpful for depressed patients. Objective The goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility and potential mechanisms of LIPUS in the treatment of depression. Methods Chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) was used to generate rats with depression-like features that were treated with four weeks of LIPUS stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Depression-like behaviors were assessed with the sucrose preference, forced swim, and open field tests. BDNF/mTORC1 signaling was examined by Western blot to investigate this potential molecular mechanism. The safety of LIPUS was evaluated using hematoxylin-eosin and Nissl staining. Results Four weeks of LIPUS stimulation significantly increased sucrose preference and reduced forced swim immobility time in CUS rats. LIPUS also partially reversed the molecular effects of CUS that included decreased levels of BDNF, phosphorylated tyrosine receptor kinase B (TrkB), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), and S6 kinase (S6K). Moreover, histological staining revealed no gross tissue damage. Conclusions Chronic LIPUS stimulation can effectively and safely improve depression-like behaviors in CUS rats. The underlying mechanisms may be related to enhancement of BDNF/ERK/mTORC1 signaling pathways in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). LIPUS is a promising noninvasive neuromodulation tool that merits further study as a potential treatment for depression.
Abstract via europepmc.
Exposures
Exposure 1: LIPUS to ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), PRF screening (200/285/500 Hz) and chronic 200 Hz stimulation
Target: ventromedial prefrontal cortex — “ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)”
Device: custom-built
| Waveform | pulsed | |
|---|---|---|
| Fundamental frequency (kHz) | 800 | ✓✓✓ |
| Pulse duration (ms) | 0.2 | ✓✓✓ |
| Pulse repetition frequency (Hz) | 200, 285, 500swept | ✓✓✓⚑ |
| Duty cycle (%) | 4 | ✓✓✓ |
| Sonication duration (s) | 1 | ✓✓✓ |
| Free-field pressure (kPa) | 400 | ✓✓✓ |
|---|---|---|
| Free-field Isppa (W/cm²) | 6.2 | ✓✓✓ |
| Free-field Ispta (W/cm²) | 0.248 | ✓✓✓ |
| In-situ estimate | measurementsingle value | |
| In-situ pressure (kPa) | 280 | ✓✓✓ |
| In-situ Isppa (W/cm²) | 3.84 | ✓✓✓ |
| In-situ Ispta (W/cm²) | 0.154 | ✓✓✓ |
Parameter screening: normal rats received a single 30-minute LIPUS session of the vmPFC at one of three PRFs (200, 285, or 500 Hz); only 200 Hz significantly reduced FST immobility, so 200 Hz was used going forward. Chronic study: rats in the CUS+LIPUS group received ultrasound stimulation for twenty minutes each day for four consecutive weeks (CUS+sham LIPUS and control groups wore the same apparatus with power turned off). Chronic parameters: 200 Hz PRF, 4% duty cycle, 0.2 ms tone burst duration, 1 s sonication duration, 3 s inter-stimulus interval.
Flags from extraction
n_subjects— Reported total covers only the chronic CUS+LIPUS group (n=8); a separate parameter-screening experiment also exposed normal rats to single LIPUS sessions (n=6-8 per PRF group across 3 PRFs), an imprecise range not included in this total.exposures[0].timing.pulse_repetition_frequency_hz— The three PRFs (200/285/500 Hz) were tested only in the single-dose screening experiment; the chronic 4-week CUS study used only 200 Hz with the other timing parameters (DC, TBD, SD, ISI) given specifically for the chronic protocol.randomised— Initial split into control/CUS groups was explicitly randomized (stratified); the subsequent redistribution of CUS rats into CUS+sham-LIPUS and CUS+LIPUS groups was based on sucrose preference index stratification rather than stated as random.