← Explore

Neuromodulation Effect of Very Low Intensity Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation on Multiple Nuclei in Rat Brain

Yingjian Liu, Gang Wang, Chao Cao, Gaorui Zhang, Emily B. Tanzi, Yang Zhang, Weidong Zhou, Yi Li

Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2021 · 10.3389/fnagi.2021.656430

rodenthealthyinvasive electrophysiology

Abstract

Objective Low-intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with high spatial resolution and feasible penetration depth. To date, the mechanisms of TUS modulated neural oscillations are not fully understood. This study designed a very low acoustic intensity (AI) TUS system that produces considerably reduced AI Ultrasound pulses ( I SPTA Methods We recorded the local field potential (LFP) of five brain nuclei under TUS with three groups of simulating parameters. Spectrum estimation, time-frequency analysis (TFA), and relative power analysis methods have been applied to investigate neural oscillation patterns under different stimulation parameters. Results Under PRF, 500 Hz and 1 kHz TUS, high-amplitude LFP activity with the auto-rhythmic pattern appeared in selected nuclei when I SPTA exceeded 12 mW/cm 2 . With TFA, high-frequency energy (slow gamma and high gamma) was significantly increased during the auto-rhythmic patterns. We observed an initial plateau in nuclei response when I SPTA reached 16.4 mW/cm 2 for RPF 500 Hz and 20.8 mW/cm 2 for RPF 1 kHz. The number of responding nuclei started decreasing while I SPTA continued increasing. Under 1.5 kHz TUS, no auto-rhythmic patterns have been observed, but slow frequency power was increased during TUS. TUS inhibited most of the frequency band and generated obvious slow waves (theta and delta band) when stimulated at RPF = 1.5 kHz, I SPTA = 8.8 mW/cm 2 . Conclusion These results demonstrate that very low intensity Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (VLTUS) exerts significant neuromodulator effects under specific parameters in rat models and may be a valid tool to study neuronal physiology.

Abstract via europepmc.

Speciesrat (Sprague-Dawley)
Subjects2 animals
Sessions per subjectnot reported
Randomisednot reported
Blindingnot reported
Sham / controlnone
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingonline
Anaesthesiaanaesthetised
Readoutsinvasive electrophysiology — Local field potentials in five nuclei (multitaper spectrum, S-transform time-frequency analysis, relative band power)
Direction of effectbidirectionalAt PRF 500 Hz and 1 kHz, intensities above about 12 mW/cm2 ISPTA produced high-amplitude auto-rhythmic LFP activity with increased gamma power; at PRF 1.5 kHz no auto-rhythm appeared and slow (delta, theta) power increased, with other bands suppressed.
Adverse eventsnot reported

Exposures

Exposure 1: VLTUS, three PRF groups

Target: primary somatosensory cortex, primary motor cortex, habenula, CA1, hippocampus — “five nuclei: SI, CA1, CA2, LHb, and MI”
Device: not reported

Pulse timing
Waveformpulsed
Fundamental frequency (kHz)500✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)0.4, 0.2, 0.134swept✓✓✓⚑
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)500, 1,000, 1,500swept✓✓✓
Duty cycle (%)20✓✓✓
Sonication duration (s)not reported⚑
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot reported
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Isppa, domain unspecified (W/cm²)0.036, 0.044, 0.06, 0.082swept✓✓✓⚑
Ispta, domain unspecified (W/cm²)0.0072, 0.0256swept✓✓✓
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Fixed 500 kHz and 20% duty cycle; three trial groups with PRF 500 Hz (200 cycles per pulse), 1 kHz (100 cycles per pulse) and 1.5 kHz (67 cycles per pulse), with amplifier gain increased across trials to raise intensity. Stimulation duration is not stated; LFP power was compared over 10 s before and after stimulation.

Flags from extraction

  • exposures[0].unspecified_domain.isppa_w_cm2 — Table 1 lists ISPPA only up to 0.082 W/cm2 (ISPTA 16.4 mW/cm2) while the text reports ISPTA up to 25.6 mW/cm2; the upper ISPPA limit is therefore probably understated. The paper does not say whether the values are before or after the 83.9% skull attenuation.
  • exposures[0].timing.pulse_duration_ms — Pulse duration not stated in ms; only cycles per pulse (200, 100, 67) are given in Table 1.
  • exposures[0].timing.sonication_duration_s — Stimulation duration (SD) appears in a figure schematic but its value is not stated in the text.
  • exposures[0].target.terms — Stimulation was applied from the occipital side (6.5 mm lateral of midline, 4 mm posterior of bregma) with a collimator and a plane transducer; LFP was recorded in S1, M1, LHb, CA1 and CA2. The recorded nuclei are listed as the target; CA2 mapped to hippocampus.
  • n_subjects — Two rats, each repeated three times per parameter set.
  • exposures[0].device.family — No transducer maker or model is named.