← Explore

Multiplexing Focused Ultrasound Stimulation with Fluorescence Microscopy

Jerome J. Lacroix, Alper D. Ozkan

Journal of Visualized Experiments 2019 · 10.3791/58781

in vitro cellhealthycellular imaging

Abstract

By focusing low-intensity ultrasound pulses that penetrate soft tissues, LIPUS represents a promising biomedical technology to remotely and safely manipulate neural firing, hormonal secretion and genetically-reprogrammed cells. However, the translation of this technology for medical applications is currently hampered by a lack of biophysical mechanisms by which targeted tissues sense and respond to LIPUS. A suitable approach to identify these mechanisms would be to use optical biosensors in combination with LIPUS to determine underlying signaling pathways. However, implementing LIPUS to a fluorescence microscope may introduce undesired mechanical artefacts due to the presence of physical interfaces that reflect, absorb and refract acoustic waves. This article presents a step-by-step procedure to incorporate LIPUS to commercially-available upright epi-fluorescence microscopes while minimizing the influence of physical interfaces along the acoustic path. A simple procedure is described to operate a single-element ultrasound transducer and to bring the focal zone of the transducer into the objective focal point. The use of LIPUS is illustrated with an example of LIPUS-induced calcium transients in cultured human glioblastoma cells measured using calcium imaging.

Abstract via europepmc.

Specieshuman (A-172 glioblastoma cell line)
Subjectsnot reported cultures
Sessions per subjectnot applicable
Randomisednot applicable
Blindingnot applicable
Sham / controlnone
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingboth
Anaesthesianot applicable
Readoutscellular imagingCalcium imaging using the cell-permeant fluorescent indicator Fluo-4 AM, quantified as relative fluorescence change (deltaF/F0) per region of interest
Direction of effectexcitatoryLIPUS stimulation of cultured human glioblastoma (A-172) cells produced robust calcium elevations (increased Fluo-4 fluorescence) during the 10 s sonication, interpreted by the authors as a non-thermal effect based on a calculated temperature rise of only about 1 mC per pulse.
Adverse eventsnot applicable

Exposures

Exposure 1: LIPUS-induced calcium imaging in cultured glioblastoma cells (representative example)

Target: other — “human glioblastoma cells (A-172) grown on a polyester-bottom culture dish
Device: not reported

Pulse timing
Waveformpulsed
Fundamental frequency (kHz)4,000✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)0.1✓✓
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)100✓✓
Duty cycle (%)1pulse duration × PRF gives 1%✓✓
Sonication duration (s)10✓✓
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)88✓✓
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)0.877✓✓
In-situ estimatenot applicable
In-situ pressure (kPa)not applicable
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not applicable
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not applicable
Protocol, in the paper’s words

LIPUS was applied by manually driving a 4 MHz transducer with a pulse waveform of 158 V peak-to-peak amplitude, 0.1 ms pulse duration and 10 ms pulse repetition frequency (i.e. 1% duty cycle). Images were acquired at a speed of 1 frame per second by a standard CCD camera and LIPUS was applied for 10 sec between frames 20 and 30; the waveform consisted of 100 usec pulses containing 400 cycles at 4 MHz and repeated every 10 ms for 10 sec.

Flags from extraction

  • exposures[0].device.familyThe protocol's Table of Materials lists several possible transducer suppliers (Olympus, Benthowave, Precision Acoustics, Ultrasonic-S-lab) but the specific device used for the representative 4 MHz experiment is not identified by manufacturer or model.
  • exposures[0].free_field.isppa_w_cm2Intensities were obtained from hydrophone calibration curves measured in the same degassed water tank used to hold the sample (no skull or intervening tissue), so classified as free-field per the bath convention; the paper does not use the term 'free field' explicitly.
  • direction_of_effectThis is a general bioeffect (calcium transient) demonstration in a non-neuronal cell line, not a neuromodulation experiment with an excitatory/inhibitory neural readout; 'excitatory' is used loosely to reflect the increase in the calcium signal.