← Explore

Cortical Hemodynamic Responses Under Focused Ultrasound Stimulation Using Real-Time Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging

Yi Yuan, Yanchao Zhao, Hongshuai Jia, Mengyang Liu, Shuo Hu, Yingwei Li, Xiaoli Li

Frontiers in Neuroscience 2018 · 10.3389/fnins.2018.00269

rodenthealthycerebral haemodynamics

Abstract

Although there is increasing use of focused ultrasound stimulation (FUS) in brain studies, the real-time changes of the cerebral blood flow (CBF) due to FUS remain unclear. In this study, we developed a novel scheme combining FUS and laser speckle contrast imaging, which can be used to measure the CBF caused by FUS in real time. The results showed that the change of CBF increased from 0 to 30 s and reached up to the maximum of 115.1 ± 6.5% at 30 s and then decreased gradually from 30 to 60 s. This study demonstrates that FUS was able to increase CBF and alter cortical hemodynamic responses, which indicates that FUS is a potential non-invasive method to study ischemic stroke rehabilitation.

Abstract via europepmc.

Speciesrat (Sprague-Dawley)
Subjects15 animals
Sessions per subjectnot reported
Randomisednot reported
Blindingnot reported
Sham / controlinactive transducer
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingboth
Anaesthesiaanaesthetised
Readoutscerebral haemodynamics — Laser speckle contrast imaging of relative cerebral blood flow; vessel diameter
Direction of effectnot assessedrCBF rose from baseline to a maximum of 115.1 ± 6.5% at 30 s then returned to baseline by about 60-80 s; control group showed no change. Neuronal excitation/inhibition was not measured.
Adverse eventsnot reportedAuthors estimated a maximum temperature rise of 0.047 °C from the stated intensity and duration.

Exposures

Exposure 1: FUS to rat cortex through craniotomy with simultaneous laser speckle imaging

Target: cerebral cortex — “the position of ultrasound stimulation, the anteroposterior (AP:3.5 mm, ML: 2.5 mm)”
Device: other named manufacturer · Siansonic Technology Co., Ltd. · QN8-30C/8-3 customized hollow transducer ✓

Pulse timing
Waveformpulsed
Fundamental frequency (kHz)2,900✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)0.5✓✓✓⚑
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)1,000✓✓✓
Duty cycle (%)not reportedpulse duration × PRF gives 50%
Sonication duration (s)0.3✓✓✓⚑
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)510✓✓✓
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)8.93✓✓✓
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)4.47✓✓✓
In-situ estimatenot reported
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Protocol, in the paper’s words

PRF 1 kHz, 300 tone bursts (NTB), 1450 cycles per pulse, ultrasound duration 300 ms, inter-stimulus interval 1 s; imaging 110 s (baseline 10 s, FUS 10 s, after FUS 90 s).

Flags from extraction

  • exposures[0].timing.sonication_duration_s — Text gives ultrasound duration 300 ms (NTB 300 at 1 kHz) but also FUS 10 s / SD 10 s in the timeline and Discussion; recorded 0.3 s.
  • n_subjects — 30 rats total (15 experimental, 15 control); recorded the 15 exposed.
  • exposures[0].unspecified_domain.pressure_kpa — 0.51 MPa measured by hydrophone at the focal spot; medium (water or tissue) not stated.
  • exposures[0].timing.pulse_duration_ms — Pulse duration not stated; 1450 cycles per pulse at 2.9 MHz given instead.
  • exposures[0].device.family — Transducer credited to Siansonic as customized hollow transducer; mapped to other_manufacturer.
  • exposures[0].target — Cortical target given only as AP 3.5 mm, ML 2.5 mm craniotomy coordinates.