← Explore

Effect of therapeutic level ultrasound on visual evoked potentials in the hypoxic cat

George V. Forester, Eric A. Peterson, Orest Z. Roy

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 1987 · 10.1016/0301-5629(87)90098-6

large animalothereeg megother

Abstract

The effect of 1.0 MHz ultrasound at an intensity of 1.0 W/cm2 SATA on brain function of anaesthetized cats was assessed using Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs). Ultrasound alone did not significantly modify the averaged VEP signals. However, acute hypoxia depressed the VEP response. When the brain was exposed to ultrasound during the hypoxic episode, the VEP response remained normal. Raising brain temperature by whole body heating could not mimic the beneficial effect of ultrasound on the VEP response during hypoxia. This suggests that therapeutic ultrasound may have a protective effect on hypoxic tissues and may have clinical applications.

Abstract via europepmc.

Speciescat
Subjects9 animals
Sessions per subjectnot reported
Randomisednot reported
Blindingnot reported
Sham / controlnone
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingonline
Anaesthesiaanaesthetised
Readoutseeg meg, other — Visual evoked potentials (surface electrode over primary visual cortex); brain temperature by thermocouples
Direction of effectmixed or unclearUltrasound alone did not significantly modify the averaged VEP; applied during acute hypoxia it kept the VEP response near normal (protective), and whole-body heating did not reproduce this.
Adverse eventsnot reportedBrain temperature was measured at the surface, 11 mm and 18 mm depth during 5 min of sonication; the 18 mm site reached 40.4 C under normoxia and 41.6 C under hypoxia.

Exposures

Exposure 1: 1 W/cm2 SATA, 1036 kHz, applied to exposed cat brain

Target: cerebral cortex — “brain exposed by removing a 3.9 cm diameter portion of the calvareum”
Device: not reported

Pulse timing
Waveformnot reported
Fundamental frequency (kHz)1,036✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)not reported
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not reported
Duty cycle (%)not reported
Sonication duration (s)not reported
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)1✓✓✓⚑
In-situ estimatenot reported
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Protocol, in the paper’s words

For Phase 3 the ultrasound generator was turned on one minute prior to the commencement of the two-minute hypoxic phase and turned off after the hypoxic episode; continuous versus pulsed mode and exposure duration are not stated for the VEP experiments (temperature measurements used five minutes of exposure).

Flags from extraction

  • exposures[0].free_field.ispta_w_cm2 — Reported as spatial-average temporal-average (SATA) intensity, measured in a water tank at the position of the proximal brain surface; recorded in the ispta field.
  • exposures[0].target.terms — Ultrasound applied through water over the exposed dura of both hemispheres (unfocused applicator, 2.5 cm element); recording electrode over primary visual cortex. Target term is a judgement.
  • exposures[0].timing.waveform — Continuous or pulsed mode not stated for this study.
  • exposures[0].device.family — Transducer maker not named; described as a piezoelectric ceramic element in an acrylic applicator, system described in an earlier paper.