← Explore

Auditory responses in cats produced by pulsed ultrasound

Kenneth R. Foster, Michael L. Wiederhold

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1978 · 10.1121/1.381829

large animalhealthyinvasive electrophysiology

Abstract

Auditory-nerve responses and cochlear microphonics are produced in cats by pulsed 5-MHz ultrasonic energy from a transducer placed against the dura mater. The pulses must be relatively intense (approximately 30 W/cm2) to produce a response, but can be sufficiently brief (less than 70 microsecond) that the brain tissue is not observably heated. The cats apparently respond to radiation pressure transients accompanying the absorption of the ultrasound in the brain tissue. Both the amplitude and latency of the N1 neural responses to the ultrasound can be matched to those produced by relatively weak tone pips or clicks from an external source. The cochlear microphonic (CM) produced by a pulse shows a prominent ringing at 5-10 kHz in different cats; the amplitued of the N1 response exhibits broad maximum, for constant amplitude pulses, a pulse widths of 20-60 microsecond. This variation of N1 response amplitude with pulse width is similar to that of a high-pass filter with a cutoff frequency at the dominent frequency of the CM, which is tentatively identified with a ringing frequency of the skull.

Abstract via europepmc.

Speciescat
Subjects6 animals
Sessions per subjectnot reported
Randomisednot reported
Blindingnot reported
Sham / controlnone
Auditory controlcontrol experiment
Readout timingonline
Anaesthesiaanaesthetised
Readoutsinvasive electrophysiology — round-window recording of cochlear microphonic and N1 auditory-nerve response
Direction of effectexcitatoryPulsed 5 MHz ultrasound applied to the dura evoked auditory-nerve (N1) responses and cochlear microphonics in all cats, attributed to radiation-pressure transients heard via bone conduction.
Adverse eventsnot reportedBrain tissue was reported as not observably heated with pulses under 70 microseconds.

Exposures

Exposure 1: 5 MHz pulses against dura over temporal cortex

Target: temporal lobe — “dura over the right temporal cortex”
Device: custom-built · in-house (0.6-cm PZT disk); one experiment used Panametrics · 0.6-cm-diam 5-MHz lead zirconate titanate disk in plastic tube

Pulse timing
Waveformpulsed
Fundamental frequency (kHz)5,000✓✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)0.01, 0.07swept✓✓✓⚑
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)10✓✓✓
Duty cycle (%)not reported
Sonication duration (s)not reported⚑
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot reported
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Isppa, domain unspecified (W/cm²)30✓✓✓⚑
Protocol, in the paper’s words

Brief 5-MHz pulses of 10-70 microseconds (about 30 W/cm2 peak) repeated at 10 per second, 200-4000 responses averaged; stimulus series bracketed by tone-pip or click comparison series. Pulse width was varied at constant amplitude.

Flags from extraction

  • exposures[0].unspecified_domain.isppa_w_cm2 — Peak intensity of about 30 W/cm2 at the dura; domain not stated; power measured by radiation balance in one setup (about 20% error).
  • exposures[0].timing.pulse_duration_ms — Pulse width varied between 10 and 70 microseconds across stimuli; recorded as range.
  • exposures[0].timing.sonication_duration_s — Each stimulus is a single brief pulse; no train duration stated.
  • exposures[0].device.family — Home-made transducer; one experiment used a Panametrics immersion transducer that was reported as inadequate.
  • auditory_control — The study is about auditory responses; comparisons with tones and a cat with broken malleus used as tests of the route, not as a control.