← Explore

A study of reception with the use of focused ultrasound. II. Effects on the animal receptor structures

Leonid R. Gavrilov, Grigoryi V. Gersuni, Oleg B. Ilyinsky, Efim M. Tsirulnikov, Eugenyi E. Shchekanov

Brain Research 1977, 135, 279-285 · 10.1016/0006-8993(77)91031-9

ex vivo tissueother vertebratehealthyinvasive electrophysiology

Abstract

The possibility of stimulation of receptor structures with focused ultrasound (focused beam of high frequency mechanical waves) was investigated. Stimulation of single Pacinian corpuscle isolated from cat's mesentery resulted in receptor and action potentials. Stimulation of frog's ear labyrinth resulted in evoked potentials recorded from midbrain auditory area, their characteristics being much the same as those for responses to adequate sound stimuli. It is concluded that focused ultrasound is an advantageous agent for stimulation of various mechanoreceptors both isolated and, especially, located deep in the body. Some problems related to sensory specificity are discussed.

Abstract via europepmc.

Speciescat (Felis catus, isolated Pacinian corpuscle from mesentery) and frog (Rana temporaria, labyrinth)
Subjectsnot reported preparations
Sessions per subjectnot reported
Randomisednot reported
Blindingnot reported
Sham / controlnone
Auditory controlnot reported
Readout timingonline
Anaesthesianot reported
Readoutsinvasive electrophysiologyreceptor and action-potential recordings from an isolated Pacinian corpuscle; evoked-potential recordings from the midbrain auditory area (torus semicircularis) in response to ultrasonic and sonic stimulation of the labyrinth.
Direction of effectexcitatoryFocused ultrasound excited isolated Pacinian corpuscles, producing graded receptor potentials and all-or-none action potentials, and excited mechanoreceptors in the frog labyrinth, producing midbrain evoked potentials similar in shape, amplitude and latency to those evoked by sound; responses disappeared after labyrinth destruction.
Adverse eventsnot reported

Exposures

Exposure 1: Isolated Pacinian corpuscle (cat mesentery)

Target: other — “isolated Pacinian corpuscle with attached nerve fibre, from cat mesentery
Device: custom-built

Pulse timing
Waveformcontinuous
Fundamental frequency (kHz)480✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)not applicable
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not applicable
Duty cycle (%)not applicable
Sonication duration (s)0.0001, 0.001swept✓✓
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot applicable
In-situ pressure (kPa)not applicable
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not applicable
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not applicable
Isppa, domain unspecified (W/cm²)0.4, 2.5swept✓✓
Protocol, in the paper’s words

An isolated Pacinian corpuscle with its nerve fibre attached was placed in vaseline oil over the ultrasonic irradiator, in the centre of the focal region; ultrasonic stimuli were rectangular bursts with duration from 0.1 msec to hundreds of msec, and receptor/action potentials were recorded via cotton-thread electrodes moistened with physiological solution.

Exposure 2: Frog's ear labyrinth, evoked potentials from contralateral midbrain auditory area

Target: vestibular organ — “frog's ear labyrinth (inner ear), recorded from the contralateral midbrain auditory area (torus semicircularis)
Device: custom-built

Pulse timing
Waveformcontinuous
Fundamental frequency (kHz)480✓✓
Pulse duration (ms)not applicable
Pulse repetition frequency (Hz)not applicable
Duty cycle (%)not applicable
Sonication duration (s)0.001, 0.1swept✓✓
Pressure and intensity, by domain
Free-field pressure (kPa)not reported
Free-field Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
Free-field Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ estimatenot reported
In-situ pressure (kPa)not reported
In-situ Isppa (W/cm²)not reported
In-situ Ispta (W/cm²)not reported
Isppa, domain unspecified (W/cm²)0.1, 1, 0.01, 0.1swept?
Protocol, in the paper’s words

An immobilised frog (left labyrinth destroyed) was fixed over the irradiator so the focal region projected into the right labyrinth, with water as the coupling medium; potentials were recorded from the contralateral (left) torus semicircularis with a tungsten microelectrode and compared with responses to sonic tone stimuli of optimal frequency.

Flags from extraction

  • exposures[0].timing.sonication_duration_sPaper states burst durations ranged 'from 0.1 msec to hundreds msec' for both preparations; only the precise lower bound (0.1 ms) is recorded as a number, since 'hundreds' is not a specific value.
  • exposures[1].target.termsNo target id in the taxonomy names the amphibian ear labyrinth specifically; 'vestibular_organ' is used as the closest anatomical match even though the structure is being tested here for its auditory (not vestibular) function.
  • n_subjectsPaper does not state the number of Pacinian-corpuscle preparations or frogs used in the main text (a figure caption implies at least 3 frogs, but figures are not used as a source of values); left not_reported.